• English
  • Español
AGENTS: Did you know you can share a personalized version of this post? Learn more!

Redistributing Wealth to the RICH?

Many people are placing the concept of homeownership under attack. There is more and more debate whether we should limit government assistance to homeowners. The administration just came out with their Reforming America’s Housing Finance Market: A Report to Congress. The report acknowledges the advantages of homeownership:

“…which has helped millions of middle class families build wealth and achieve the American Dream.”

The paper also talks about curtailing a century of government assistance for American homeownership (ex. the elimination of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac):

“But our plan also dramatically transforms the role of government in the housing market. In the past, the government’s financial and tax policies encouraged housing purchases and real estate investment over other sectors of our economy, and ultimately left taxpayers responsible for much of the risk incurred by a poorly supervised housing finance market.

Going forward, the government’s primary role should be limited to robust oversight and consumer protection, targeted assistance for low- and moderate-income homeowners and renters.”

At the same time it speaks of increasing its support for rental housing:

“The Administration believes that we must continue to take the necessary steps to ensure that Americans have access to an adequate range of affordable housing options. This does not mean all Americans should become homeowners … we should ensure that there are a range of affordable options for the 100 million Americans who rent, whether they do so by choice or necessity.”

In a press release announcing the administration’s points, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan is quoted:

“We must continue to take the necessary steps to ensure that Americans have access to quality housing they can afford.  This involves rebalancing our housing priorities to support a range of affordable options, from promoting much-needed financing for quality, affordable rental homes to ensuring the availability of safe, and sustainable mortgage products for current and future homeowners.”

This is not just a matter of semantics. In his prepared testimony before the House Committee on Financial Services, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said:

Our goal is not for every American to become a homeowner.”

The administration is taking a strong stance against government’s role in supporting homeownership. This would be a major change in policy. Assistance for homeownership has been important to America for a century. Many young people were able to attend college because their parents were willing and able to refinance their home to pay the tuition. Many American business owners got their start-up capital by taking an equity loan on their house. Renters won’t be able to ask their landlords to help pay their child’s college tuition. Renters can’t expect landlords to finance the development of the new product they discovered.

If we start to create a land with greater numbers of renters, those able to still purchase property will get wealthier collecting the rents from those who can no longer attain the American Dream. The administration calls for more support for these developers:

“The Administration will explore ways to provide greater support for rental housing. One option would be to do so by expanding FHA’s capacity to support lending to the multifamily market.”

This will lead to the redistribution of wealth in this country with the owners of the rental units building family wealth with profits generated by this real estate.

Diana Olick in an article for CNBC Realty Check quotes Democrat Melvin Watt of North Carolina:

“…there’s not going to be any home ownership at the low income level…Rich people will have home ownership and rich people will make money on apartment rentals, but we’ll be a renter nation for low-income people.”

We have to make sure this is the America we want.


Members: Sign in now to set up your Personalized Posts & start sharing today!

Not a Member Yet? Click Here to learn more about KCM’s newest feature, Personalized Posts.

6 replies
  1. Darren Doucet
    Darren Doucet says:

    Yes, Barney Frank & Bill Clinton’s push that “everyone in America should own a home” is flawed if you completely throw underwriting out the window (Freddie & Ginnie are NOT broken)! The systemic problem is a result of $7 trillion in corrupt, double-double-wagers (10 times) in credit-default-swaps against the miniscule $700 billion in total bundled mortgage securities. The CDS industry is regulated by NO government in the world & there is no monitoring/clearing house any where in the world. We’re all ignorant fools (individuals, businesses, media) to simply sweep this under the rug. After all, this problem/loop-hole has still NOT be corralled/rectified!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!

    Reply
  2. Shaun Reilly
    Shaun Reilly says:

    This is one of the few rational policies form the government on the question of housing.
    While they might take it to far and make it more difficult for those that should have a chance to own a home it is SMART to limit the number of unqualified people from getting into a situation they can’t handle.
    At the start of the housing crisis there were a lot of people that were defaulting on mortgages they never should have had, many because they should have been life long renters.

    Reply
  3. Sally
    Sally says:

    This reminds me of a segment in an old movie classic, It’s A Wonderful Life, starring Jimmy Stewart. When George is telling people that he took a chance on them and they were able to buy homes and start businesses. Potter wanted to keep them all under his thumb, renting and living in his slum homes.

    Reply
  4. Ryan
    Ryan says:

    The Boom and Bust cycles in housing are what is causing the wealth transfer. Buy low sell high. Take a wild guess who/what is causing our housing market to reach crazy high unsustainable levels followed by harder and hard busts. You guessed it, our government. Just take a look north to Canada. No gov. subsidies and secondary markets, no tax right offs, at least 10% down but the vast majority have to put at least 20% down. Canada must have a low homeownership rate! All the rich people must own all the real estate in Canada! How sad! Wait a minute, their homeownership rates are actually higher than the US? How could that be?

    Our government has no place in the real estate market period. They are doing more damage than good. Homeownership is not a right it is privilege. It is earned by maintaining stable employment, discipline in saving money, and responsible spending habits. Giving people money, regardless of race, gender, religion, age, etc, that can not afford it is just plain stupid.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *